In this window you can switch the placement of cookies on and off. Only the Functional Cookies cannot be switched off. Your cookies preferences will be stored for 9 months, after which they will be set to default again. You can always manage your preferences and revoke your marketing consent via the Cookie Statement page in the lower left corner of the website.
Cookies help Springest work as smoothly as possible. Accept all or manage your preferences. Without additional cookies, recommendations, videos and remembering preferences will not work optimally. You remain anonymous.
For more information, please visit the Cookie Statement page.
1. Kellogg / Hong Kong UST Business School
2. Columbia/London Business School
3. Trium: HEC Paris / LSE / New York University: Stern
4. Insead
5. University of Chicago: Booth
The Financial Times has been publishing Business School rankings since 1999. The objectives are "to produce a listing of business schools that are producing the global managers for the 21st century". They are publishing five different rankings spread out over the whole year:
Except for its latest ranking, the Master's in Management Programme, which ranks pre-experience (Bologna Master) programmes, the programmes covered are continuous and executive education programmes . There are some 15-20 criteria used in the different rankings, addressing the overarching goal of customer satisfaction. The ranking criteria vary, but they are mostly based on four general aspects:
FT rankings are highly selective. Only business schools with a strong international orientation and a high reputation are eligible. The rankings are mostly global in its scope, some of them are european. The published rankings are dominated by English-speaking business schools, which is also due to some cultural biases embedded in the ranking methodology. This can be seen in the overriding importance given to salary-related criteria (40% of the weight) and the required publication in a selected group of 40 English language journals (10%).